Low trading costs
Start with the complete cost of trading: spread, commission, financing and execution. Discuss a pricing package for your desk’s flow.
Discuss pricingDrovix / Technology benchmarkResearch review / 05 Oct 2026
Institutional performance.
Built for better economics.
Commercial terms and leverage depend on the instrument and approved counterparty agreement. Slippage varies with market conditions, liquidity and order size.
PERFORMANCE & COST EFFICIENCY
Performance has a price.
Make it count.
Explore the cost of your trading flow, the capital it requires, and the engineering behind Drovix. Switch views to see the full picture.
What every million costs.
Illustrative cost scenariosFive editable cost curves show how execution economics compound with volume. These are scenarios, not measured LP prices. Add an agreed Drovix quote to evaluate it alongside them.
Inspect USD millions
Scenario 1 · $10/m$3,000
Scenario 2 · $15/m$4,500
Scenario 3 · $20/m$6,000
Scenario 4 · $25/m$7,500
Scenario 5 · $30/m$9,000
Edit cost assumptions & add a Drovix quote
Five neutral scenarios, not Brand A–H pricing. All values are USD per $1 million traded.
No Drovix rate is pre-filled. Values entered here are local calculations and are not submitted or saved.
Cost = volume × entered rate. Scenario curves have no fixed fees or tiers. Use the same one-way or round-trip convention and include spread, commission, financing and slippage consistently. Public LP entry fees alone cannot establish all-in costs.
View all chart values & measurement notes
| Series | 0 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario 1 · $10/m | 0 | 1,000 | 2,000 | 3,000 | 4,000 | 5,000 |
| Scenario 2 · $15/m | 0 | 1,500 | 3,000 | 4,500 | 6,000 | 7,500 |
| Scenario 3 · $20/m | 0 | 2,000 | 4,000 | 6,000 | 8,000 | 10,000 |
| Scenario 4 · $25/m | 0 | 2,500 | 5,000 | 7,500 | 10,000 | 12,500 |
| Scenario 5 · $30/m | 0 | 3,000 | 6,000 | 9,000 | 12,000 | 15,000 |
Scenario 1 · $10/m: Editable illustrative rate; no provider attribution or fixed fees.
Scenario 2 · $15/m: Editable illustrative rate; no provider attribution or fixed fees.
Scenario 3 · $20/m: Editable illustrative rate; no provider attribution or fixed fees.
Scenario 4 · $25/m: Editable illustrative rate; no provider attribution or fixed fees.
Scenario 5 · $30/m: Editable illustrative rate; no provider attribution or fixed fees.
8 researched LPsPublic terms in the comparison below.Explore Brand A–H ↗
Drovix measurements: June 2026 internal engineering reports. Public terms reviewed 05 Oct 2026. Methodology & limitations ↗
01 / The Drovix approachYour trading economics.
Your trading economics.
Our engineering priorities.
Cost-efficient liquidity. Capital flexibility. Execution designed to minimise slippage.
Drovix develops its own market-making and bridge technology. That gives technical teams a defined architecture to examine, from the pricing engine to the institutional interface.
Explore our technologyHigh leverage
Discuss leverage and margin terms around your institution, instruments and risk profile. Available leverage is set in the approved agreement.
Discuss leverageLow slippage
Execution quality is central to the Drovix proposition. Review fill prices against the agreed benchmark across order sizes and market conditions.
Discuss executionThese are Drovix’s commercial priorities. A lowest-cost, highest-leverage or lowest-slippage ranking requires matched provider terms and execution data; the technical measurements below do not establish those rankings.
Pricing coreC++20
Native market-making engine
Internal transportAeron
Engine-to-bridge communication
Institutional connectivityFIX 4.4
Standards-based integration
02 / Side by sideThe details
The details
make the difference.
Eight broker-facing FX/CFD liquidity providers, selected for service overlap with Drovix. Public entry costs, margin terms and execution disclosures help frame your evaluation; company size is not a selection claim. Scroll the table to explore all eight providers.
Brand A–H represent real providers. Source links below identify the underlying publications. Provider claims and historical Drovix measurements use different conditions; this table does not establish a performance ranking. “Not disclosed” means absent from the reviewed sources, not absent from the product.
| Technology & capability | DrovixDocumented architecture | Brand A | Brand B | Brand C | Brand D | Brand E | Brand F | Brand G | Brand H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial focusTrading costs | Low-cost propositionSpread, commission & financing agreed for your flow; no matched cost study | Bridge includedNo extra MT4/MT5 bridge fee; all-in trading quote not published[A] | From $1,000/monthEntry offer; WL minimums differ. Spreads from 0.1 pip; not all-in[B] | FX spreads from zeroMinimum advertised spread; no comparable all-in tariff[C] | Tailored institutional termsIndicative spread feed; no comparable all-in tariff[D] | From $1,000/monthPublished entry fee; commissions and other costs separate[E] | Bespoke pricingNo comparable public all-in tariff[F] | From $7 / millionMay fall to $5 with volume; $2,000 monthly minimum; $10,000 initial deposit[G] | Spreads from 0.0 pipsBespoke commissions; additional fees may apply[H] |
| Commercial focusLeverage & margin | High-leverage propositionRatio subject to instrument, risk approval and agreement | Confirm with providerNo numeric ratio in reviewed current offer[A] | Up to 1:200Subject to business needs and risk requirements[B] | FX margin from 1%Current global offer; instrument-dependent, not universal leverage[C] | 1:400 FXPublished headline; entity and instrument terms apply[D] | Tailored termsNo numerical institutional leverage in reviewed pages[E] | Cross-margin offeringNo comparable FX leverage ratio in reviewed pages[F] | Confirm with providerNo numeric ratio in reviewed launch disclosure[G] | Flexible marginNo numeric institutional ratio in reviewed page[H] |
| Commercial focusSlippage & fill quality | Low-slippage focusNo matched fill-slippage dataset presented; not established by ack latency | 99% silver fill ratioProvider report: 30 Jan 2026; not a slippage distribution[A] | No last lookExecution policy claim; no matched slippage dataset[B] | Zero-slippage claimProvider marketing; no matched distribution supplied[C] | Execution consistency focusNo numeric slippage distribution in reviewed sources[D] | Flow analyticsNo matched slippage distribution published[E] | Low-slippage focusQualitative claim; no matched distribution[F] | Aggregated executionNo matched slippage distribution in reviewed disclosure[G] | Broad flow acceptanceNo matched slippage distribution published[H] |
| Service modelLiquidity relationship | Principal OTCBilateral institutional relationship | Prime of primeBroker FX/CFD liquidity[A] | Prime of primeProfessional B2B FX/CFD liquidity[B] | Aggregated CFD liquidityBroker-facing multi-asset offer[C] | Institutional FX/CFDsBroker, bank and asset-manager service[D] | Prime-of-prime servicesBrokerage firms, funds and trading desks[E] | OTC market making + DMABroker-facing multi-asset solutions[F] | Institutional aggregationBrokers, hedge funds and prop firms[G] | Institutional multi-assetBroker and professional-counterparty offering[H] |
| TechnologyEngineering approach | Owned engine + bridgeC++20 pricing core · Aeron IPC | Match-Trader PROProprietary stack built by technology partner Match-Trade[A] | Match-Trader PROMatching, aggregation and HawkEye risk controls[B] | Proprietary aggregation10-level market depth; bridge-free offer[C] | Integrated technology stackCentroid / PrimeXM / oneZero / Ultency[D] | In-house technologyPosition Keeper and up to 10 levels of depth[E] | Proprietary aggregationMulti-platform technology ecosystem[F] | Ultency + EquinixNative integration and dedicated cross-connects[G] | TickTrader / ECN technologyLondon LD4 connectivity[H] |
| ConnectivityAPI access | FIX 4.4 + web APIsREST and WebSocket interfaces | FIX connectivityExecution, depth and hedge-account data[A] | FIX APIBroker platform connectivity[B] | Confirm API specificationReviewed offer does not specify protocol/version[C] | FIX APIDirect and bridge connectivity disclosed[D] | Confirm API specificationReviewed connectivity page focuses on MT4/MT5[E] | FIX APIThird-party trading access[F] | FIX APIListed institutional integration route[G] | FIX / REST / WebSocketPublished trading interfaces[H] |
| Broker integrationMetaTrader connectivity | Drovix MT5 bridgeOwned institutional integration route | MT4 / MT5 includedBridge at no additional cost[A] | MT4 / MT5 includedA-Book and B-Book bridge at no additional cost[B] | Bridge-free offerConfirm target-platform integration and fees[C] | MT5 GatewayIntegration gateway publicly documented[D] | MT4 / MT5White-label liquidity solutions[E] | MT4 / MT5Platforms publicly disclosed[F] | Native MT5Ultency connection without external bridges[G] | Confirm integrationReviewed institutional page centres on TickTrader[H] |
| Different measurement boundariesReported latency¹ | 5.7 ms p99Historical local FIX resting-order ack · 1,000/s · 21 Jun 2026 | 16 ms averageSilver during 30 Jan 2026 volatility; provider-reported[A] | Under 3 msExecution claim; percentile and test boundary unspecified[B] | Under 1 msExecution claim; percentile and test boundary unspecified[C] | Low latencyNo numeric value in reviewed current pages[D] | Low latencyNo numeric execution value in reviewed pages[E] | Low latencyNo numeric value in reviewed pages[F] | Hundredths of a msNetwork latency in some scenarios; not end-to-end fills[G] | Low latencyNo numeric execution value in reviewed page[H] |
| Evidence standardMatched cross-provider test | Not run for this page | Not run for this page | Not run for this page | Not run for this page | Not run for this page | Not run for this page | Not run for this page | Not run for this page | Not run for this page |
03 / Drovix engineering measurementsReal measurements.
Real measurements.
Clearly defined paths.
Historical internal reports, with dates and measurement boundaries preserved. These are observations from specific revisions, not a live service-level guarantee.
Crypto market-data processing. Histogram-interpolated p99 across BTCUSD, ETHUSD and BTCEUR; more than 250,000 ticks per symbol.
07 Jun 2026 · internal production report · engine bcde9e6At 1,000 resting orders/s, 6,000 submitted orders, zero rejects. Local FIX → bridge → engine → durable acknowledgement; no fills.
21 Jun 2026 · internal production report · engine ee4290afSame path. Two tested loads.
FIX acknowledgement latency
Milliseconds · lower is faster · historical local test
300 orders/s
p503.4 ms
p994.8 ms
1,000 orders/s
p503.2 ms
p995.7 ms
The June order test reported queue formation around 1,500–2,000 orders/s and approximately 5.1 seconds p99 at 3,000/s. Accordingly, 1,000/s is the bounded-latency observation shown here, not a claim about current maximum capacity. Tick-to-quote, resting-order acknowledgement and external fill latency are different measurements. Historical source summaries are in the methodology below; current performance requires a new test.
04 / Under the surfaceOne connected
One connected
technology story.
Follow the responsibilities across the stack. Each layer has a distinct role in the institutional relationship.
Connect
Institutional interfacesFIX 4.4, REST, WebSocket and MT5 integration routes connect the desk’s infrastructure to the agreed service scope.
Price & manage
Drovix market-makingThe C++20 engine brings pricing, inventory and risk decisions together, with Aeron communication between engine and bridge.
Review
Execution & reportingReview order states, execution records and reporting against the counterparty configuration and agreed measurement boundary.
Conceptual architecture. Available interfaces, configuration and service scope are established during institutional onboarding. Technology choices alone do not establish latency, fill quality or superiority over another provider.
05 / Measurement mattersA benchmark is only
A benchmark is only
as good as its method.
01Define the measurement boundary
Measure internal engine processing separately from client-to-gateway round-trip and external execution. Identify the start and end events, clock source and timestamp precision for every result.
02Match the test conditions
Use the same region, hardware class, network path, instrument set, message sizes and concurrency. Record the software version, warm-up period, test duration and offered load.
03Report the distribution
Publish p50, p95 and p99 latency alongside throughput, error rates and sample count. Include rejected instructions and timeouts so a fast subset cannot hide the complete outcome.
04Make the comparison reproducible
Record each provider’s configuration and data source. Preserve the test procedure and dated results. Anonymised Brand A–H results require the same evidence standard as Drovix.
¹ Latency figures in the comparison are not directly comparable. Brand A reports average silver execution during a specific market event; Brands B and C advertise execution latency without a matched test boundary or percentile. Drovix reports local resting-order acknowledgement p99, not trade fills. These values cannot establish a speed ranking. Entry fees and minimum spreads also do not establish all-in trading costs. Architecture references: Drovix technology, market-making and risk & controls. C++20 and Aeron are documented in the Drovix engine’s engineering documentation. Historical Drovix results: internal engineering reports dated 07 and 21 June 2026 (engine revisions bcde9e6 and ee4290af). No new benchmark was run for this page. No independent comparative performance study is presented here.
Research notes / Reviewed 05 Oct 2026
Follow the evidence.
Official provider publications support each comparison column. Brand labels simplify the table; source destinations reveal the provider. Published claims have not been independently re-tested.
Brand A · Match-Prime
Liquidity offerTechnology & included bridgeDated silver execution and fill reportBrand C · Broctagon
Current institutional liquidity, margin & execution offerBrand G · Luramic
Institutional launch, fees & MT5 integrationBrand H · FXOpen Institutional
UK institutional offer & connectivityPut the right
questions to our desk.
Discuss a technical evaluation For approved institutional and professional counterparties.